Discussion:
[xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?
Enrico Maria Giordano
2016-10-08 22:11:44 UTC
Permalink
Using the latest xHarbour from SVN, any FWH program crashes with a message

Module: 'blabla' was compiled into PCODE version: 0,this version of
xHarbour expects version: 10

What's happening?

EMG

--
http://www.emagsoftware.it
http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic
http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum
http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg
Andi Jahja
2016-10-09 01:02:35 UTC
Permalink
Do not know what happen. But clean builds solve this issue.

Andi

On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 00:11:44 +0200
Post by Enrico Maria Giordano
Using the latest xHarbour from SVN, any FWH program crashes with a message
Module: 'blabla' was compiled into PCODE version: 0,this version of
xHarbour expects version: 10
What's happening?
EMG
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Enrico Maria Giordano
2016-10-09 10:25:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Andi Jahja
Do not know what happen. But clean builds solve this issue.
Clean builds of what?

EMG

--
http://www.emagsoftware.it
http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic
http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum
http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg
Enrico Maria Giordano
2016-10-09 11:27:36 UTC
Permalink
All PRG's need to be recompiled.
PCODE version is not changed from build 20160815. I suspect a bug
somewhere. Anyway, a change of PCODE version *must* be officially announced.

EMG

--
http://www.emagsoftware.it
http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic
http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum
http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg
Patrick Mast
2016-10-09 11:45:11 UTC
Permalink
Hello Entico,
Yes, you are correct.

Patrick
On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Enrico Maria Giordano
All PRG's need to be recompiled.
PCODE version is not changed from build 20160815. I suspect a bug
somewhere. Anyway, a change of PCODE version *must* be officially
announced.

EMG

--
http://www.emagsoftware.it
http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic
http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum
http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg
Enrico Maria Giordano
2016-10-09 16:18:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick Mast
Patrick
Not need recompile ill revert changes today
Thank you, Luiz!

EMG

--
http://www.emagsoftware.it
http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic
http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum
http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg
Enrico Maria Giordano
2016-10-09 20:37:59 UTC
Permalink
Patrick, Enrico
Revert or keep changes?
I don't know. If they are absolutely necessary then keep them, otherwise
revert them.

EMG

--
http://www.emagsoftware.it
http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic
http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum
http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg
Patrick Mast
2016-10-10 12:08:02 UTC
Permalink
Hey Luiz,
If the changes are necessary or make xHarbour better, than we should keep the changes.
It seems these changes need an increase of PCode level, right?
PCode increase is a serious matter in my opinion. All PRG’s in user’s code AND 3rd party products need to be recompiled. *IF* we can avoid it, I’m in favour.

Patrick
On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Rafael Culik <***@gmail.com> wrote:
Patrick, Enrico
Revert or keep changes?
Regards Luiz
2016-10-09 13:18 GMT-03:00 Enrico Maria Giordano < ***@emagsoftware.it [***@emagsoftware.it] > :


Il 09/10/2016 17:43, Rafael Culik ha scritto:

Patrick

Not need recompile ill revert changes today

Thank you, Luiz!

EMG

--
http://www.emagsoftware.it [http://www.emagsoftware.it]
http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic [http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic]
http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum [http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum]
http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg [http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg]
Patrick Mast
2016-10-10 12:33:51 UTC
Permalink
Luiz,
Thanks for considering. What is it exactly you changed? What will be reverted? Can you explain the change?

Patrick
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Rafael Culik <***@gmail.com> wrote:
Patrick i can keep the fix for init on new gcc and revert to not need pcode change

Regards
Luiz


Em 10 de out de 2016 09:08, "Patrick Mast" < ***@xharbour.com [***@xharbour.com] > escreveu:
Hey Luiz,
If the changes are necessary or make xHarbour better, than we should keep the changes.
It seems these changes need an increase of PCode level, right?
PCode increase is a serious matter in my opinion. All PRG’s in user’s code AND 3rd party products need to be recompiled. *IF* we can avoid it, I’m in favour.

Patrick
On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Rafael Culik < ***@gmail.com [***@gmail.com] > wrote:
Patrick, Enrico
Revert or keep changes?
Regards Luiz
2016-10-09 13:18 GMT-03:00 Enrico Maria Giordano < ***@emagsoftware.it [***@emagsoftware.it] > :


Il 09/10/2016 17:43, Rafael Culik ha scritto:

Patrick

Not need recompile ill revert changes today

Thank you, Luiz!

EMG

--
http://www.emagsoftware.it [http://www.emagsoftware.it]
http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic [http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic]
http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum [http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum]
http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg [http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg]
Enrico Maria Giordano
2016-10-10 14:24:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick Mast
Patrick
I can revert the new parameter and still has the fix
Great! Looks as the best solution.

EMG

--
http://www.emagsoftware.it
http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic
http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum
http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg
Patrick Mast
2016-10-10 14:27:16 UTC
Permalink
Hey Luiz,I can revert the new parameter and still has the fix

Thanks!
But, please, try to reply in more than just two words ;-)
What is it exactly you changed? What will be reverted? Can you explain the
change?
Patrick
Patrick Mast
2016-10-10 16:40:50 UTC
Permalink
Thank you Luiz! 😀

Patrick
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Rafael Culik <***@gmail.com> wrote:
Patrick

Ok. Ill commit tonight. Sorry for few words. New phone

Regards
Luiz


Em 10 de out de 2016 11:27, "Patrick Mast" < ***@xharbour.com [***@xharbour.com] > escreveu:
Hey Luiz,I can revert the new parameter and still has the fix

Thanks!
But, please, try to reply in more than just two words ;-)
What is it exactly you changed? What will be reverted? Can you explain the change?
Patrick
Patrick Mast
2016-10-13 12:29:54 UTC
Permalink
All compiles OK now with latest xHarbour sources. Thank you Luiz! 😀

Patrick
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Patrick Mast <***@xharbour.com> wrote:
Thank you Luiz! 😀

Patrick
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Rafael Culik <***@gmail.com> wrote:
Patrick

Ok. Ill commit tonight. Sorry for few words. New phone

Regards
Luiz


Em 10 de out de 2016 11:27, "Patrick Mast" < ***@xharbour.com [***@xharbour.com] > escreveu:
Hey Luiz,I can revert the new parameter and still has the fix

Thanks!
But, please, try to reply in more than just two words ;-)
What is it exactly you changed? What will be reverted? Can you explain the change?
Patrick

Patrick Mast
2016-10-09 06:39:44 UTC
Permalink
Hey Enrico,
I get the same error building xBuild. Should PCode be increased?

Patrick
On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 00:11, Enrico Maria Giordano
<***@emagsoftware.it> wrote:
Using the latest xHarbour from SVN, any FWH program crashes with a message

Module: 'blabla' was compiled into PCODE version: 0,this version of
xHarbour expects version: 10

What's happening?

EMG

--
http://www.emagsoftware.it
http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic
http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum
http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg
Enrico Maria Giordano
2016-10-09 09:38:17 UTC
Permalink
Fwh need recompile
Ok, thank you.

EMG

--
http://www.emagsoftware.it
http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic
http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum
http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg
Enrico Maria Giordano
2016-10-09 10:15:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick Mast
Enrico
Fix is on the oven. will commit tomorrow
So, FWH doesn't need to be recompiled?

EMG

--
http://www.emagsoftware.it
http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic
http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum
http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg
Loading...